Subscribe Twitter

Tuesday, March 4, 2008

US Military: Iran is still supporting militias

Why Ahmadeniwhatever didn't get blown up

Spc. Joshua Robles from Columbus, Georgia, USA, of Alpha Company, 2nd Platoon, 1-15 Infantry, 3rd Brigade Combat team, 3rd Infantry Division, guards as Iraqi civilians work to clean a road during a patrol at Salman Pak about 30 miles (45 kilometers), south of Baghdad, Iraq, on Tuesday, March. 4, 2008.
(AP Photo/Petros Giannakouris)

WASHINGTON - Military officials accused Iran on Tuesday of continuing to train and arm insurgents in Iraq, while U.S. lawmakers said they were disappointed that Baghdad opened up its doors to the Islamic Republic's top leader.

"I think it's offensive," said Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's two-day trip to Iraq this week.

Iraq has "got every right to invite whomever they want. They're sovereign. But we have a right to express an opinion about it," added Levin, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

Levin's remarks come as the U.S. is struggling to combat Iran's growing influence in the region, and senior military commanders say it continues to provide powerful bombs to Shiite militias in Iraq.

"We have no doubt they are still supporting insurgents," said Lt. Gen. Ray Odierno, the former No. 2 military commander in Iraq, at a Pentagon press conference. Asked if that was the greatest threat to stability in Iraq, he said, "If you ask me what I worry about most, I do worry about that as a long-term threat. And I think we have to, you know, constantly watch it."

Odierno, who has been nominated for a fourth star and assignment as vice chief of staff of the Army, said it was not surprising that there were fewer attacks during Ahmadinejad's visit to Baghdad, since it is mainly Iranian-backed Shiite military members who have been conducting rocket and other attacks in the capital.

Adm. William Fallon, the top commander of troops in the Middle East, echoed these remarks in a Senate hearing at which he said Iran was fanning the flames of global terrorism.

While Ahmadinejad has denied charges of harmful meddling in Iraq, "the facts prove otherwise," Fallon told the Senate Armed Services Committee.

Ahmadinejad's visit to Iraq marked the first by an Iranian leader since the country's 1979 Islamic Revolution. During his trip, he insisted U.S. power is crippling the region and portrayed himself as the enduring partner of Baghdad's Shiite-led government.

The U.S. has no diplomatic ties with Iran because it regards the country as a state sponsor of terror. But recognizing its influence on Iraq stability, officials last year opened limited discussions with Iranian officials by demanding the country stop arming Shiite militias.

Fallon called Ahmadinejad's visit a "mixed bag" because it presented an opportunity for Baghdad to push Ahmadinejad directly to stop the flow of weapons and start working with coalition forces.

"From our perspective, we are not going to help resolve the problems inside that country without assistance from outside," he said.

But several lawmakers on the panel said they saw Baghdad's invitation as a grave mistake and said Iran deserves only to be isolated.

"I would hope that others in the administration would express their indignation about this visit and the comments made by that president because they go to the very heart of the enormity of the sacrifices of life and limb that we have suffered in trying to provide Iraq the ability to become a strong and sovereign nation," said Sen. John Warner, the committee's No. 2 Republican.

More broadly on Iraq, Odierno and Fallon said they were encouraged at prospects for further progress even as the United States reduces its troop levels over the next few months.

"I think there should be little doubt that our desire is to continue to bring our force levels down, as the Iraqis demonstrate their ability to stand up and take responsibility for security in the country," Fallon said. "Those trends are certainly encouraging and moving in the right direction. But it's critical that we don't lose the ground that's been so hard fought."

Fallon said officials will probably need some time this summer to reassess the situation before drawing down more troops.

By July, the Pentagon is on track to complete its reduction from 20 to 15 active-duty brigades deployed to Iraq. Gen. David Petraeus, the top commander in Iraq, was expected to ask President Bush to wait until as late as September to decide whether to bring home more troops.

Fallon cautioned that any specific timeline is purely speculation at this point.

"Nothing is written in stone," he said.

Odierno spoke hopefully of an apparent change of direction by radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr and his Mahdi Army, which has posed some of the biggest challenges to U.S. efforts to stabilize the country.

"I think he's trying to move them away from a militia-based organization to one that is more — as it started out to be — helping the poor Shiite community have a role and a vote in what goes on in the government of Iraq," Odierno said. "I think I see him trying to move toward that."

He said this is encouraging in the sense that the majority of the Mahdi Army is "becoming more reconcilable" with the central government and its efforts to develop a Sunni-Shiite power sharing arrangement.

Rogue elements of the Mahdi Army are being supported by Iran and are now splitting off from al-Sadr's main movement, the general said. "That's actually helpful for us because we now understand who's doing what."


Anonymous said...

No doubt that Iran is still supporting the militias. I have always supported the idea of U.S. special forces engaging the militia at their staging areas inside of Iran proper. That tactic puts the militias on the defence immediately. I have never much cared for the constraints of international law or the notion of sovereignty when fighting a war against insurgents. They don't play by the rules. Why should the U.S.?.....Especially when it has been proven that Iran sponsors the militias. Maybe some weak hearted Democrats would feel that the U.S. should strive for the highest standard in international conduct. If this is so, it would be at the risk of endangering American citizens.
Thank God for Petraeus though. His command has proven to be so successful that the militias appear to be on the way out. No special tactics needed.....
I don't believe for a second that Iran has dropped it's nuclear weapon ambitions. They're still skeptical in europe about it. Middle Eastern nations are fearful too.
I pray that the Iranian leadership
will rot from the inside out and the people of Iran will cast them out for good. At that time Iran and the U.S. can properly deal with their chequered past. It is inevitable. I just hope something doesn't happen in the meantime.