NY Times: Rivals in G.O.P. Struggle to Woo Bush’s Donors

Update:Yahoo News: Angst in Military over Pentagon Cuts. This is so wrong. George W Bush would never have allowed this, mainly because he cares about the troops so much (if you read his book Decision Points, you'll come to the same conclusion!). He would never demoralize them. But hey, this is what Ron Paul libertarians and crazy hippies want- major cut in Defense spending. Not cool.
/rant

You know I'm not surprised by this, considering the crop of Republican presidential candidates suck balls compared to George Bush. If you've read Robert Draper's Dead Certain, you get the feeling that those who supported George Bush were really loyal to him. Yes, a few stabbed him in the back when it was convenient to do so, but the majority of his staff and supporters remained loyal to him- some even left lucrative jobs or sold off their own businesses to serve GWB's cause. I don't see the current field of Republican presidential hopefuls have that kind of backing- but then, like I said, most of them just totally suck. So uninspiring. So ridiculously right-wing and libertarian they make Dick Cheney and his merry band of defense hawks look like flaming liberals. (By the way, I'm a huge fan of Dick Cheney and his merry band of defense hawks. Libertarians? Not so much.)




Rivals in G.O.P. Struggle to Woo Bush’s Donors
By NICHOLAS CONFESSORE
Published: August 3, 2011

The calls come at least once a week these days, with growing urgency: friends of the Republican presidential candidates, aides to the candidates, and often the candidates themselves, wondering if Al Hoffman Jr. might be ready to lend a hand.

“How are you doing? What are you feeling? What are you thinking?” Mr. Hoffman, a Florida real estate developer who was a co-chairman of George W. Bush’s presidential campaigns, said in describing the calls. But Mr. Hoffman, one of the Republican Party’s most sought-after fund-raisers, remains unconvinced that he should tap into his extensive network of contacts to raise money for any of them.

“None of the candidates have instantly identified themselves as a leader for the Republican movement,” Mr. Hoffman said. “The Bush family were instantly identifiable as leaders.”

He is far from alone. Two and a half years after Mr. Bush left the White House, the formidable network of Republican donors he assembled has largely melted away. Fewer than one in five of Mr. Bush’s Rangers and Pioneers, the elite corps of “bundlers” who helped Mr. Bush smash fund-raising records in his two runs for the White House and remain the gold standard of Republican fund-raising, have contributed to any of the current Republican candidates, according to a New York Times analysis.


Their absence underscores the challenges facing the Republican Party in what could prove to be a protracted primary campaign followed by a hugely expensive general election matchup against an incumbent president.
No Republican candidate for president this year has yet shown the kind of broad appeal that rapidly drew the party’s donor establishment to Mr. Bush early in his first run, with only Mitt Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, raising enough money in the early going to assure being competitive through this year.
In an economy that has drained pocketbooks and inhibited the emergence of a younger class of wealthy donors, no Republican candidate has yet been able to seize the imagination and loyalty of a new generation of financial supporters. While the eventual nominee will have an opportunity to unite donors now dispersed among the sprawling primary field and benefit from the pools of money backing conservative causes, none of the candidates have yet assembled the kind of big-check network that could be confident of keeping up with the fund-raising machine built by President Obama.
And some large bundlers, unsatisfied with the presidential field, are choosing to place their bets with the party’s Congressional wing or with independent expenditure groups, which offer them the ease of writing a single check instead of the grinding work of wrangling contributions from dozens of friends and business associates.
“Nobody is inheriting any kind of apparatus left over from the Bushes at all,” said Ray Washburne, a Dallas entrepreneur and former Bush Ranger who is backing Tim Pawlenty, the former Minnesota governor. “Everything’s going to have to be recreated. There are new players who want to play, and there are other people tired and done.”
More of Mr. Bush’s former supporters could still emerge later in the race or after the party settles on a nominee, as many Rangers and Pioneers did for Senator John McCain of Arizona, the nominee in 2008. Some may be awaiting the entry into the presidential race of Gov. Rick Perry of Texas, though some longtime Bush supporters said there was relatively little overlap between Mr. Bush’s network of financial supporters and the one built by Mr. Perry, a powerhouse fund-raiser in his own right.
And no fund-raising machine exists in perpetuity: Large networks of bundlers are built first and foremost on the personal loyalty to specific candidates.
“I tried to retire last time, and I really put my foot down this time,” said Bradford M. Freeman, a financier who led Mr. Bush’s California finance team and was among the top bundlers for Mr. McCain. “I was a very close personal friend with President Bush. It was a labor of love.”
Some Republicans suggested the Bush fund-raising machine rested on circumstances that would be hard for other candidates to replicate. As the governor of Texas, the son of a former president and brother of a Florida governor, Mr. Bush could tap into three of the party’s most robust networks of supporters. In his first campaign, Mr. Bush ran during an economic boom and after eight years of a Democratic administration loathed by his party; during his second, as an incumbent during wartime.
“We put together a fund-raising team that was pretty dang good,” said James B. Francis Jr., a Texan who organized the Pioneer network during Mr. Bush’s first run but has not signed on with any of the current Republican candidates. “But it’s not monolithic. And obviously, when you have a completely different field, and George Bush is not in the race, people are going to go in different directions.”
The fragmentation of Mr. Bush’s donor network also reflects a lull in the Bush dynasty. Mr. Bush left office in 2009; his brother, Jeb Bush, the former Florida governor, in 2007. No family member currently holds elective office, and the closest thing to a Bush campaign in politics today is Maverick PAC, co-founded by George P. Bush, the former president’s nephew, to organize Republican young professionals.
“The day the 2004 campaign was over, you got a tie, and that was it,” Mr. Washburne said.
Those of Mr. Bush’s former top operatives still working in politics are scattered around research organizations, lobby shops and independent expenditure groups, some of which are proving attractive for Republican donors eager to have an impact in the presidential race but unwilling to pick a candidate yet.
A. Jerrold Perenchio, the billionaire founder of Univision, was a Bush Pioneer in 2004 and a national finance chairman of Mr. McCain’s 2008 campaign. Mr. Perenchio has not yet donated to any of the Republican candidates, but in April a trust he controls donated $2 million to American Crossroads, a so-called Super PAC founded by Karl Rove, Mr. Bush’s former adviser.
Some Bush alumni said they believed many former Bush donors had decided to cast their lots with Mr. Rove early in the cycle, rather than with the still-fluctuating Republican field.
“I don’t think the Rangers and Pioneers aren’t playing, I think they are playing in a new way,” said Mark McKinnon, a former Bush strategist. “My guess is that many of them have determined their money is much better invested and spent in the Super PACs. A lot of them know and trust Karl Rove to give them a good bang for their buck. So that’s where their bucks are going.”
Mr. Bush’s Rangers and Pioneers are still a prized commodity in Republican presidential politics, their allegiance avidly sought by most of the candidates and — once won — quietly advertised to other potential supporters as evidence of viability and establishment support.
Of those Bush bundlers still active in politics, Mr. Romney appears to have drawn the most big names, among them the financier Lewis M. Eisenberg, H. Gary Morse, a Florida real estate developer, and Sam Fox, a former ambassador to Belgium.
Their support has helped Mr. Romney lap the Republican competition: during the three months ending June 30, he raised $18.25 million, four times more than any other candidate.