Pages

Subscribe Twitter

Monday, August 6, 2007

Hillary Clinton's "Let's talk, let's chat..."


Hillary's Presidential Message:




Update: WSJ- Take it from this old KGB hand: The left is abetting America's enemies with its intemperate attacks on President Bush.
....During the Vietnam War we spread vitriolic stories around the world, pretending that America's presidents sent Genghis Khan-style barbarian soldiers to Vietnam who raped at random, taped electrical wires to human genitals, cut off limbs, blew up bodies and razed entire villages. Those weren't facts. They were our tales, but some seven million Americans ended up being convinced their own president, not communism, was the enemy. As Yuri Andropov, who conceived this dezinformatsiya war against the U.S., used to tell me, people are more willing to believe smut than holiness. [Please read the whole article!]

Update: Nooo, Brits! Don't goooo! WASHINGTON POST: As British forces pull back from Basra in southern Iraq, Shiite militias there have escalated a violent battle against each other for political supremacy and control over oil resources, deepening concerns among some U.S. officials in Baghdad that elements of Iraq's Shiite-dominated national government will turn on one another once U.S. troops begin to draw down.

Update: VIDEO: al-Qaeda is not playing nice! Disgusting little pigs they are! I still wonder why various organizations and fat-ass Socialist individuals rally behind these so-called "Iraqi freedom fighters". They blow-up mosques, bomb children, decapitate their victims, kidnap young women, blow-up more mosques, bomb more children, decapitate more victims, and kidnap more young women. These are vicious spree-killers -not "revolutionaries" as some would kindly label them. I mean, I'm not the smartest living human being on earth, but even I can distinguish a really, really, really bad guy from a fighting-against-American-imperialists-for-liberty kind of guy. And gee, aren't "American imperialists" better than, say, al-Qaeda?

0 comments: